Responsible and ethical use of AI by lawyers and legal professionals
When used responsibly (and ethically), AI can improve efficiency in legal practice by saving time, reducing costs for clients, and helping to identify and minimise errors.
Examples of how AI can support lawyers include:
- Quickly summarising information, such as case law or factual briefs
- Generating a first draft of precedents, templates, letters, and other correspondence (or as a tool to edit, finetune or condense existing drafts)
- Assisting with legal research and electronic discovery
- Creating cost-effective marketing content
- Transcribing and summarising meetings or interviews
- Proofreading and reviewing documents, emails, and contracts
However, there are also risks if you don’t understand how using AI tools may infringe your ethical obligations. Examples of risks that arise from the use of AI in legal practice include:
- Information inaccuracy: generated false response or ‘hallucinations’ and limitations arising generally from limited source data
- Threats to confidentiality and privacy: firms using open generative AI tools are at risk of inadvertently violating non-disclosure agreements or client confidentiality including use of client data to train AI tools or by third party AI vendors
- Risk of copyright or intellectual property infringement: many open generative AI tools draw upon materials that is likely to include copyright material and you may unknowingly violate copyright laws when using its responses.
AI-generated material may have serious errors or include complete fabrications. Practitioners need to educate themselves and their staff about these risks and take reasonable steps within their practice to create safeguards to uphold their ethical obligations when using AI.
To assist, we have compiled below some useful resources regarding the responsible use of AI specifically in legal practice published by the law societies.
For more information about the approach of individual courts to the use of AI in particular jurisdictions, including practice directions, click here.
Useful resources
Ethical guidance from law societies
- Law Council of Australia – Safe and responsible AI in Australia
- Queensland Law Society – Guidance Statement No. 37 Artificial Intelligence in Legal Practice
- LIV Ethics Guidance – Ethical and responsible use of AI in legal practice
- Law Society of NSW – A Solicitor’s guide to responsible use of artificial intelligence
- Law Society of NSW – AI for government legal professionals
Ethical commentary (Law Society Brief articles)
- AI use leads to heavily restricted practising certificate (2025)
- Lawyers’ ethics and the use of artificial intelligence in legal services (2023)
- Generative AI and ethical considerations in legal practice (2024)
- Copyright and generative artificial intelligence (2023)
- Working with legal tech (and will AI replace junior lawyers) (2023)
- AI and the future of law (comparison of articles written by a human vs AI and what this means for the practice of law) (2023)
AI misuse and the risks of AI in legal practice
- Centre for the Future of the Legal Profession (CFLP) – GenAI, Fake Law & Fallout: A review of the misuse of generative artificial intelligence in legal proceedings
- UNSW Law Journal – The promise and peril of the use of gen AI in litigation
- LIV – Administrative law-related issues pertaining to AI use in decision-making
- NSW Bar Association – Issues arising from the use of AI in language models (including ChatGPT) in legal practice
Risk management
- Legal Practice Board of Western Australia, NSW Law Society and Victorian Legal Services Board and Commissioner – Joint statement on the use of artificial intelligence in Australian legal practice
- Victorian Legal Services Board and Commissioner – Risk outlook improper use of AI
- Legal Practitioners’ Liability Committee (Victoria) – Managing the risks of AI in law practices
International perspectives
- The Conversation (by Senior Lecturer in Professional Legal Education, King’s College London) – Lawyers are rapidly embracing AI: Here’s how to avoid an ethical disaster
- UNSW Law Journal – Generative AI, fake law and professional guidance
- The State Bar of California – Practical guidance for the use of generative artificial intelligence in the practice of law
- The Law Society of England and Wales – Generative AI: The essentials
- The Bar Council of England and Wales – Considerations when using ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence software based on large language models